California Registered Dental Hygienist (RDH) Law and Ethics exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the California RDH Law and Ethics Exam with our comprehensive quizzes. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions that provide hints and explanations. Ensure you're well-prepared for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the ethical obligation of a social worker regarding a client who wishes the social worker to be their sponsor after a year of sobriety?

  1. Tell the client it would create a dual relationship

  2. Wait two years before beginning any relationship with them

  3. Agree to be the sponsor after the client terminates therapy

  4. Assess for any countertransference that may affect the relationship

The correct answer is: Tell the client it would create a dual relationship

The ethical obligation of a social worker regarding the request from a client to be a sponsor after a year of sobriety revolves around recognizing the potential for dual relationships and the complexities they can introduce into the therapeutic context. Accepting the role of a sponsor would blur the boundaries between the professional and personal relationship, leading to a dual relationship that can undermine the objectivity and effectiveness of their professional role. In social work ethics, maintaining clear boundaries is essential to protect both the client and the integrity of the therapeutic process. A dual relationship can create conflicts of interest, impact the client's perception of the social worker's role, and could potentially exploit the client's vulnerability. By acknowledging that taking on the role of a sponsor after being their therapist poses risks to both parties, the social worker upholds ethical standards that prioritize client welfare and the professional's responsibility to avoid situations that can harm the therapeutic alliance. Waiting for a specific timeframe, such as two years, does not inherently resolve the ethical conflict present in transitioning to a new role. Simply waiting can lead to an assumption that time alone will negate the dual relationship issue. Agreeing to be the sponsor after termination of therapy also fails to fully address the complexities that can arise from past professional dynamics and client dependency. Assessing for counter